Friday, March 8, 2013

Norway fund dumps palm oil holdings


March 9, 2013 
Orangutans are some of the likely beneficiaries of the use of surveillance drones.
Palm oil plantations threaten the habit of orang-utans. Photo: Alamy
Norway's $US710 billion sovereign wealth fund has pulled out of 23 Asian palm oil companies after accusing them of causing deforestation, winning praise from environmentalists.

It said it sold stakes in the firms after a review of companies that have cleared forests for palm oil plantations in Malaysia and Indonesia. Palm oil is used in many foods and consumer goods such as soaps, lipstick and peanut butter.

The fund is one of the world's biggest investors, underpinned by Norway's oil and gas assets. Last year it expanded its investment guidelines to include deforestation as a threat to future growth.

Stakes in firms including Wilmar, KL Kepong and Golden Agri-Resources were sold during 2012, according to the fund's annual report released on Friday.

Of these, the biggest holding had been in Singapore-listed Wilmar, worth 382 million crowns ($65 million).

"In the first quarter of 2012 we sold our stakes in 23 companies that by our reckoning produced palm oil unsustainably," the fund said, without naming any firms.

Norway has given more than any other developed nation to help slow deforestation, partly as a way to avert climate change. Indonesia is home to the world's third-largest expanse of tropical forests and is the top prodicer of palm oil. Malaysia is the world's second largest producer.

The companies deny that they are a threat to forests.

Golden Agri's website, for instance, says: "we aim to be the leader in sustainable palm oil production." Wilmar and KL Kepong similarly say that they support best practices and standards to protect the environment.

Double standards

The Rainforest Foundation environmental group has long accused Norway of double standards by investing billions of dollars in palm oil or soya farmers while also giving cash to nations from Brazil to Indonesia to slow deforestation.

"We are very happy with this development in the palm oil sector," said Nils Hermann Ranum, of Norway's branch of the Foundation.

Still, he said that Norway should do more to pull out of other sectors that cause deforestation, such as logging companies, oil and gas firms, soya and meat producers.

By the Foundation's estimates, Norway had investments totalling $US13.2 billion in companies damaging rainforests at the end of 2012, against $US14.4 billion a year earlier. "They need a more coherent policy," he said.

Norway has programmes to slow deforestation worth $US1 billion each for Brazil and Indonesia, as well as smaller projects in nations from Guyana to Tanzania.

Many companies, including Anglo-Dutch consumer group Unilever and Swiss food group Nestle, have cracked down on palm oil suppliers in recent years because of worries about deforestation.

Deforestation accounts for up to about a fifth of greenhouse gases from human sources. Forests soak up carbon dioxide as they grow and release it when they burn or rot.

Yngve Slyngstad, head of Norway's fund, told Reuters that Oslo was trying to invest more in palm oil producers whose policies did not damage forests that are home to endangered animals such as orang-utans and absorb greenhouse gases.

"We have sold many of the small companies and concentrated investment in larger companies who often have a better practice," he said.

Among palm oil firms, the fund more than quadrupled its holdings in Malaysia's Sime Darby to a value of 688.8 million crowns at the end of 2012 from 150.7 million crowns a year earlier.

Reuters


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/carbon-economy/norway-fund-dumps-palm-oil-holdings-20130309-2frz1.html#ixzz2N1UaM59Z

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Growing Demand for Palm Oil Drives Malaysia to Employ Child Migrant Workers

Special correspondent Steve Sapienza exposes the human cost of palm oil, a cheap ingredient used in many processed foods. In Malaysia, the world's second largest exporter of the oil, producers employ child migrant workers to keep up with demand. The story is part of a collaboration with the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/world/jan-june13/palmoil_02-12.html

Friday, February 8, 2013

Was Palm Oil to Blame for the Poisoning of 14 Pygmy Elephants?

February 5, 2013



pygmy elephant baby
When wildlife officials in Borneo first encountered a three-month-old pygmy elephant on January 25, he was surrounded by death. Four members of his herd lay on the ground around him, their bodies cold and bloody. The baby was nudging his dead mother with his trunk, trying to get her to rise and feed him.

Tragically, the four dead elephants were not the first, nor were they the last. Six bodies had already been found that month, rotting carcasses away in the Gunung Rara Forest Reserve in northeastern Borneo. Four more were found in the days to come. Initial investigations revealed that the dead elephants were all suffering from severe bleeding and gastrointestinal ulcers, most likely caused by poisoning.

The 14 deaths represent a loss of approximately 1 percent of the entire Borneo pygmy elephant (Elephas maximus borneensis) population worldwide, which is estimated at between 1,000 and 1,500 animals.
slain pygmy elephant
Unlike elephants poached for their ivory tusks every day, these smaller animals likely died because they got too close to the highly profitable commercial palm oil plantations that have replaced many of Borneo’s forests. Plantation workers have been known to leave out poison for “pest” animals, including elephants. As far back as 2009 the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) warned that pygmy elephants were dying from ingesting these poisons.  At least two plantations and several commercial logging concerns surround Gunung Rara. The area where the dead elephants were found is also set to be converted into plantations.

Palm oil is an inexpensive ingredient used in foods and cosmetics around the world. Palm oil plantations—which have also displaced orangutans and other species—have sprung up all over Borneo and the neighboring island of Sumatra. To make room for them, old-growth rainforests are burned down, often illegally. In some regions deforestation rates have reached 90 percent or more. Not only do these plantations destroy elephants’ habitats and migration corridors, they also pose a secondary threat: Elephants love to eat palm tree fruits, a hunger that puts the animals in continual conflict with plantation workers. Demand for palm oil in Indonesia also decimates rain forests and fuels climate change.

Pygmy elephants, which stand about 2.5 meters (not all much shorter than their mainland cousins) and bear shorter trunks and longer tails, only live in the northeastern corner of Borneo, which is part of Malaysia. (Indonesia and Brunei control the rest of the island.) The elephants were historically thought to be remnants of a 17th-century domesticated herd but DNA tests conducted in 2003 revealed that they are actually a genetically distinct subspecies that diverged from other Asian elephants 300,000 years ago.

The three-month-old orphan who survived the poisoning, now named “Kejora” or “Joe” for short, is being raised at Lok Kawi Wildlife Park, where he appears to be healthy. Yayasan Sabah, the company that holds the largest logging concerns in the region, says it working with the government to investigate the elephant deaths. Meanwhile, wildlife officials are on the search for any more dead elephants in the area, which could be likely because herds usually include dozens of animals. The WWF has called for greater conservation of Sabah’s forest landscapes and long-term plans to protect the pygmy elephants and other species that live in the region.

People often ask me, “What can I do to protect endangered species?” In this particular case there’s a clear answer: avoid all food and cosmetic products that contain palm oil. Although some palm oil is farmed sustainably, most to date is not. Palm oil appears under quite a few different names, so cutting it out of your shopping list can be difficult. The Web site Say No to Palm Oil, although a bit U.K.-centric, has the best information.

Photos: Sabah Wildlife Department

About the Author: Twice a week, John Platt shines a light on endangered species from all over the globe, exploring not just why they are dying out but also what's being done to rescue them from oblivion.

Monday, December 17, 2012

Palm oil or lard?


Less lard means more palm oil, with dire implications for rainforests 

Animal fats and margarine consumption in the United States have been largely replaced by palm oil, a plant-based oil that has similar cooking properties, but may not be as environmentally-friendly as commonly believed, argues a researcher in this week's issue of Nature.

mongabay.com 
December 07, 2012



Friday, December 7, 2012

REDDY at last

Good news for the forest and for the people of the forest

http://www.economist.com/news/asia/21568002-good-news-forest-and-people-forest-reddy-last


Something to celebrate
 
CLIMATE-CHANGE talks in Doha this week opened in a mood of pessimism. But one cheering announcement punctured the gloom: that Indonesia’s government had formally approved the country’s first project under the “REDD” scheme (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation).
Indonesia is one of world’s big emitters of carbon, largely because of logging. REDD, to which Norway has committed $1 billion for Indonesia, pays developing countries not to chop down trees. In this project, known as Rimba Raya (“infinite forest”), forest in Borneo the size of Singapore will be preserved. Against the odds, it will not be turned into one of the vast palm-oil plantations that are eating up so much of the country.

Investors in the project, which include Gazprom, Russia’s huge gas producer, and Allianz, a German financial-services giant, will receive about 104m credits over the project’s 30-year life, each representing a tonne of averted carbon emissions. At current market rates, these would be worth some $500m. Money will be ploughed back into projects in the area—clean water, health, microcredit, ecotourism and so on.

All this is good news for orang-utans, an endangered species. Several hundred have fled the encroaching oil palms to take refuge in a national park, Tanjung Puting, next door. There, a centre run by Biruté Galdikas, a famous primatologist, rehabilitates orang-utan refugees. They should now be able to return to the wild.

Rimba Raya seemed about to go ahead in 2010. Then it stalled and, at one point, the government said its area would have to be cut in half, rendering it unviable. The problem was that, to qualify for REDD, there has to be a real threat to the trees. In this case there was: a big palm-oil company had overlapping concessions, which it has only just agreed to relinquish. Forestry management in Indonesia has long been riddled with corruption. Even well-meaning Indonesian officials doubt whether REDD can match the money that timber and palm-oil barons can offer.
That Rimba Raya has persisted and won is a tribute to the tenacity of its promoters. But their experience raises a hard question. If a project with so much in its favour finds the going so hard, what hope is there for others?